Graffitiing and speechmaking on public property should be banned. Anarchists and fundamentalists have no right to use public property to disseminate their nasty views.

The above argument assumes that:

  • anarchists and fundamentalists always use public property to disseminate their ideas.
  • legal restrictions may apply to a select group.
  • those who indulge in graffiting and speechmaking on public property are anarchists and fundamentalists.
  • law should not extend protection to those who create disorder.